O pensamento jusfilosófico na era da inteligência artificial

Maíra Almeida; Alexander Ali Shah

doi:10.17655/rdct.2022.e0002

Authors

Maíra Almeida Universidade Estácio de Sá https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-1663
Alexander Shah Advocacia-Geral da União https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9985-8944

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17655/rdct.2022.e0002

Keywords:

Philosophy of Law, Theory of Constitution, Artificial Intelligence, New Technologies, Jus-Philosophical Thinking, Legal Positivism, Jus naturalism

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationships between constitutional theory and the philosophy of law with artificial intelligence. Through this investigation, we seek to understand whether new technologies and artificial intelligence influence legal science and juris philosophical thought. The aim is to highlight the characteristics of artificial intelligence and its degree of objectivity and subjectivity, comparing them with natural law and legal positivism. To this end, a brief history of natural law and positive law will be provided, and the use of artificial intelligence in the present day will be analyzed, allowing for a comparison between these two branches of human knowledge: the science of law and technological science. These considerations aim to understand whether the influence of artificial intelligence on legal science is neutral or not, and in the case of a lack of neutrality, the direction in which technology attracts the law

Author Biographies

Maíra Almeida, Universidade Estácio de Sá

PhD and Master in Law from UFRJ. She was a visiting researcher at Harvard Law School with the support of the Fulbright Commission. She is a permanent professor at PPGD-Unesa, and has received a productivity scholarship. Lawyer | Email: almeida.maira.1@gmail.com

Alexander Shah, Advocacia-Geral da União

Master's student in Law at UNESA, with a research line in Fundamental Rights and New Rights. Bachelor of Laws (UERJ/1999) and postgraduate degree in Electronic Law (UNESA/2018). Technologist in Data Processing (FIAA/1989) and postgraduate degree in Systems Analysis (UVA/1995). Federal Attorney since 2002. He has professional experience in the area of information technology, as a programmer and systems analyst, from 1986 to 2001, and in the legal area from 2001 to the present. | Email: alexshah1@yahoo.com.br

References

ALEXY, R. Teoria dos direitos fundamentais. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 2008.

ATALLAH, C.C.A. O direito natural na obra de Thomás Antônio Gonzaga. Maringá: Revista Brasileira de História das Religiões, v.10, n.29, p.237-265, 2017. Doi: 10.4025/rbhranpuh.v10i29.33344.

BOBBIO, N. Jusnaturalismo e positivismo jurídico. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2015.

CARNELUTTI, F.B. Dei positivismo giuridico. Padova: Cedam, 1953.

CONSORTE, P. A humanização das máquinas e a maquinização das pessoas. [s.d.] Disponível em: https://pedroconsortebr.wordpress.com/2016/10/09/humanizacao-de-robos-x-robotizacao-das-pessoas/

DONEDA, D.C.M et al. Considerações iniciais sobre inteligência artificial, ética e autonomia pessoal. Fortaleza: Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas, v.23, n.4, p.1-17, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.5020/2317-2150.2018.8257

DWORKIN, R. A Raposa e o Porco-espinho. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2014.

DWORKIN, R. Levando os direitos a sério. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2010.

GARCIA, L.R. et al. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) - Guia de Implantação. São Paulo: Blucher, 2020.

HESPANHA, A.M. Da iustitia à disciplina. Coimbra: Boletim da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, 1984.

HOBBES, T. Leviatã: matéria, forma e poder de um estado eclesiástico civil. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2014.

HUSAIN, A. The sentient machine: The coming age of artificial intelligence. New York: Scribner, 2017.

KELSEN, H. Teoria pura do direito. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.

MALDONADO, N.V.; BLUM, R.O. LGPD - Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados comentada. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2021.

MENDES, L.S.; MATTIUZO, M. Discriminação Algorítmica: Conceito, Fundamento Legal e Tipologia. Porto Alegre: RDU, 2019.